Ben Marx

/ / / / / /

Sending and Receiving UDP

Let’s take a look at how to use UDP with Elixir. User Datagram Protocol, or UDP, like TCP, is one of the core internet protocols. It was designed in 1980 by David Reed.

UDP is a connectionless communication model and, as a result, doesn’t require any previous communication. All you need is an open socket, and you can start sending packets—datagrams—to other hosts.

Unlike TCP, there is no handshake, and there are no guarantees around delivery, order, or duplicate packets sent. If you’re using UDP, you must be willing to accept some packet loss. The tradeoff, as you might imagine, is that UDP faster and more lightweight. You give up the delivery and ordering guarantees for speed. If you need those guarantees, TCP is the way to go.

Since UDP is connectionless, one can broadcast packets to all devices on some network. Continuing with the connectionless theme, UDP can also multicast. In the context of UDP, multicast is to send a single packet to any number of subscribers.

All of these qualities make UDP a good bet for streaming, VOIP, or gaming applications where the primary concern is speed, and some packet loss is acceptable.

With a cursory understanding of UDP, let’s move on to how to send and receive UDP packets with Elixir.

Sending and Receiving Packets with :gen_udp

As everyone knows, Elixir is built on top of Erlang, which means two things generally: using the BEAM virtual machine and having access to any of Erlang’s functions and modules. This was—and continues to be—a great advantage for Elixir. In the early days of Elixir, developers already had access to all the Erlang packages and lower-level modules like :gen_udp. :gen_udp is, in the Erlang tradition of gen_*, a generic interface for all things UDP. It’s a terse module with only a few exported functions befitting UDP.

Let’s open a socket, send a message, and verify that the receiver received the message. We can do all this from two iex sessions. Open two terminal windows and start iex in each window.

As you can see from the erlang docs, open/1 in Erlang parlance open(Port) -> {ok, Socket} | {error, Reason} takes a port and returns either an {:ok, socket} tuple or an {:error, reason} tuple. Pick a port, let’s says 8679 and hope the socket opens.

Interactive Elixir (1.9.1) - press Ctrl+C to exit (type h() ENTER for help)
iex(1)> {:ok, socket} = :gen_udp.open(8679)
{:ok, #Port<0.5>}

Look at that—it worked.

Now in the other iex session, let’s send a message. We can do that with send/4 or again in Erlang parlance send(Socket, Host, Port, Packet) -> ok | {error, Reason}. We need to open a distinct socket, provide a host—{127,0,0,1}, a port—8679 and a Packet or message. We’ll look at the composition of an actual UDP packet later. For now, it’s simply a message. Like we did in the first window, we need to open a socket—a different one, to be clear.

Interactive Elixir (1.9.1) - press Ctrl+C to exit (type h() ENTER for help)
iex(1)> {:ok, socket} = :gen_udp.open(8680)
{:ok, #Port<0.5>}

With the port open, we can send/4 a message to port 8679. It’s still open and waiting.

iex(2)> :gen_udp.send(socket, {127,0,0,1}, 8679, "hello")
:ok

We pass in the socket, the host, the port, and a message. What better way to begin a conversation than with hello. You can see from the :ok output that the message was sent. However, in the first terminal window, we see no message. What gives.

We need to flush/0 to see whatever messages might have been sent to it.

iex(2)> flush()
{:udp, #Port<0.5>, {127, 0, 0, 1}, 8680, 'hello'}
:ok

There we have it. Send as many messages as you wish and flush/0 them to see all the messages sent. Notice the 5-tuple beginning with :udp. If you’re using :gen_udp in a GenServer, for instance, you can pattern match with a handle_info/2 to do something with the message you receive on that socket.

Passively Recv’ing Packets

Let’s take a look at recv/2. From the docs it says “Receives a packet from a socket in passive mode.” By default, open/2 starts in active mode. In order to understand the difference between active and passive mode, we’ll need to take a look at :inet.setopts/2.

When a socket is set to active mode, “everything received from the socket is sent as messages to the receiving process.” This is probably what you want and it’s why it’s the default. passive must manually receive incoming data using recv/2. Note that this active and passive division also applies to gen_tcp:recv/2,3 and gen_sctp:recv/1,2.

So let’s set up a passive connection and show how that differs from an active connection. Like before, start two iex sessions and in the first one, type the following:

iex(1)> {:ok, socket} = :gen_udp.open(8679, [:binary, {:active, false}])
{:ok, #Port<0.5>}

In the other session, start an active session as before:

iex(1)> {:ok, socket} = :gen_udp.open(8680)
{:ok, #Port<0.5>}

Now, send a message to port 8679.

iex(2)> :gen_udp.send(socket, {127,0,0,1}, 8679, "hello")
:ok

Let’s flush/0 to see if the message arrived.

iex(2)> flush()
:ok

As expected, no message has arrived. Let’s use recv/2 to see if the message will arrive. The first argument is the socket and the second is the length of the packet. In the docs it says the packet can be Length = integer() >= 0.

iex(3)> :gen_udp.recv(socket, 0)
{:ok, { {127, 0, 0, 1}, 8680, "hello"} }

It arrives as soon as the socket is set up to receive messages. Curiously, the message still arrives even though the actual message size must be bigger than zero.

You might have noticed that there’s a recv/3, as well. Most functions in Erlang and Elixir that wait on something have an option timeout parameter. It makes sense; there’s no real guarantee that something might arrive from somewhere else. So do you wait endlessly or fail and do something else? I generally set pretty aggressively—but within reason—low timeouts. I’d rather find out sooner than later. And so, if you run recv/2 there’s an implied timeout of infinity. If you want to see how recv/3 operates, add an integer in milliseconds as the third argument.

iex(5)> :gen_udp.recv(socket, 0, 5_000)
{:error, :timeout}

Again, in the tried and true Erlang fashion, there’s an :error tuple you can match on and respond accordingly.

In lieu of comments, for any corrections or questions, please send an email to ben[at]bgmarx.com. I'll update the post and give credit for corrections and/or clarifications.